The Miraculous Bible, Coronavirus, & Mythbusters
Are there scientific proofs that the Bible has a miraculous
Source? Coronavirus: Why didn't Google honor
the Bible, since it was 3000 years ahead of the scientist they chose?
Solutions for the coronavirus
& communicable diseases were in the Bible 3000 years before "modern" medicine
discovered them. Why does God allow
evil,
pain, and sufffering? Famous scientists (Isaac Newton, Johannas Kepler, Michael
Faraday, etc.) understood the Bible has a miraculous Source, so they used their Bibles to
bust the myths of the "modern science" of their day. Will you be a
mythbuster
like they were? Isaac Newton's belief in the Bible was so well
known that the government asked him to _____ because the people trusted him. 3400 years ago Moses wrote about
diseases and that wooden bowls were better than pottery (modern science
discoved that wood has anti-bacterial agents).
Job described a feature on the bottom of the ocean floor (average 2 miles
deep). How did the Bible know that? See
the
video. New short
7 to 10 minutes videos:
Again, how did the bible know these scientific facts hundreds of years before science
discovered them:
Germs & Disease,
Food Consumption. See
amazing
archaeological discoveries, more scientific facts,
vestigial organs, junk
DNA, fossil record, transitional organisms, genetic mutations, natural selection
of peppered moths, homology,
6 proofs for
God's existence, world's top atheistic philosopher
debates Dr. Warren, etc. Short videos on
each of
the planets in our solar system.
Bible,
contradictions?
Scientific
Evidence That The Bible Is From God
Famous scientists (like
Isaac Newton) used the Bible as their Treasure Map in doing their science.
Isaac Newton said his science textbook was to point people to God. Can you prove the Bible is from God
(Psalm 18:30, 1 Thess. 5:21)? These Myth-Busters did! What
scientific facts were in the Bible, long
before man discovered them? See the
Videos & Scientific
Research Articles.
Why Won't They Listen? (video) Why Americans are not listening to the Bible. Start in Genesis like Paul did for gentiles.
Are You A Functional Atheist? (video) 75% of Americans call themselves Christians, yet they have been taught to think like an atheist.
See the scientific evidences and famous scientists proof as an article, audio, or video (not available yet) called "Science's Treasure Map: The Bible" (full pfd version, short flyer pdf version), (640x480 video. Click here for the smaller 400x300 video). By Geoffrey Rowe, Electrical Engineer @ Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Did the Bible reveal scientific facts long before men of science discovered them? (such as: the number of stars, features on the bottom of the ocean floor, land elevations, medical facts about blood, hygeine, and communicable diseases, etc.) Audio lessons.
If you could prove the Bible was from God, would you study it more? We can, and we do.
 |
 |
 |
Note the irony: The great founders of most branches of science said their science benefited and was guided by their following the Bible. They were in the minority then and so are liked minded scientists today. The majority of scientists have always rejected God's word, just like 1 Corinthians 1:26 said they would (wise according to this world). Look how much these few scientists were able to accomplish (Ecclesiastes 2:26) since they gave honor to God. Will you?
Excerpt from the lesson above (press here for the video's text in PDF format);
Historical Proof
Let us compare
the accuracy of man’s best historians, with the Bible.
Has man ever been this accurate?
Uniqueness of the Bible - Unity & Diversity
The Bible is a collection of 66 books written by 40 different authors, on three different continents, in three different languages, over a period of 1500 years. Yet all 66 books have a marvelous unity. ... 40 men have never written with such unity and agreement. ... Press here to see the graphical cross references diagram and the full article (or download the PDF flyer).
Signature of Life
The Bible's Creation Account Explains it,
Evolution Cannot
... Making up excuses for not believing in God is nothing new. Evolutionists have been inventing and then changing their “just so stories” for thousands of years just to avoid the obvious. In the mid-1800s the famous scientist Louis Pasteur was ridiculed for not believing in upward evolution. Yet he is the one who found the signature of life in ...
... the evolutionists were not silenced until Mr. Pasteur
showed the public his famous swan neck flask experiments (1862).
Then the “common” people easily understood what has now become
called the Fundamental Law of Biology: “Life only comes from preceding
life and that of its own kind.”
The
public’s
understanding of this law
finally silenced the evolutionists. Why
didn’t the evidence itself
convince the evolutionists?
Just like today, until the
public understands the
impossibility of evolution, the evolutionists (who control most of the
sources of information in our culture – TV, newspapers, public schools,
universities, etc.) will not give up their theories.
How would you prove the Bible is from God? What would prove the Bible itself is a miracle? Or what would be considered as evidence it could only be from God? As one writer said, "When you have the truth, education is the surest way to win the war of ideas." The Bible says only those who have a love (willing to sacrifice) for the truth will be saved. Others will believe a lie (2 Thess 2:10, Rom 1:20, 25).
A Christian's faith (PDF & video on Faith) is based on the evidence of the power of God, not persuasive words (1 Cor 2:4-5). First century Christians had evidence that the message preached was from God by the demonstration of miraculous powers. We have a more complete evidence today through the miraculous Bible.
1 Cor 13:8-12 shows that miraculous powers would cease when that which is perfect (meaning complete) has come. That which is perfect (i.e. the Bible) has come. James 1:25 says the Bible is the perfect law of liberty. So how do we prove to ourselves and others that the Bible is miraculous (Psalm 18:30, Rom 1:20, 1 Thess 5:21)? We can prove it using history, medicine, prophecy, archeology, paleontology, biology, physics, chemistry, etc.
Evolutionists hide the many miracles required by their theories (their myths). How often does upward evolution require miracles? You may be surprised to know that upward evolution requires miracles more often than Creation. And evolutionists do not have any proofs that their miracles actually occured. Yet the Bible has many proofs that it is a message from a God that worked miracles. Test (2 Samuel 22:31, 1 Thess 5:21) these evidences for yourself. Think for yourself.
True science has never relied on the majority opinions of educated men. Loius Pasteur could not get educated men to accept what is now called the fundamental law of biology (life cannot come from non-life). He had to prove it to the public first. Only when the public saw the evidences clearly did the educated people grudgingly acknowledge the truth. Getting life started requires a miracle. Therefore evolution requires yet another miracle. Yet the public is mislead into thinking evolution does not require miracles.
Which miracles will you believe in? I will believe in the miracles that have the evidences to back them up.
Does Evidence Matter?
Why Should I Believe The Bible?
Knowing God, Or Blind Faith? (09/17/06)
Faith & Nietzsche ...“Faith means not wanting to know what is true.”... Many people today would likely agree with his severely flawed definition. They set faith in opposition to knowledge and act as if faith bypasses the brain. ...
The O'Reilly-Dawkins Conversation On Atheism (05/13/07)
A Review of Sins of Scripture (06/10/07)
Creation Versus Evolution At UCF (03/07/04)
The Zeigeist Theory (Part 1) (11/11/07) ... The thesis of The Zeitgeist is really bizarre when one thinks about the theory that the CTs present, but they do it in a convincing manner. Basically, they search for scraps of historical material, which are loosely related, and then sew them together into an anti-religious quilt—a technique also used by premillennialists. ...
Evolution: No Need For Debate (02/03/08) ... She commands those who believe in intelligent design or the Bible to “stay out of my classroom.” From whom does she derive this authority? And what will be the next demand—to remove “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance”? To delete “In God We Trust” from our currency? What is it that she fears? ...
The Bible's Buried Secrets (A Review) (11/30/08) ... This two-hour television special on PBS did have a noble theme to it—that ...
Proof - Hundreds Of Articles
Apologetics Press caution:
Dave Miller (Ph.D.)
is the head of Apologetics Press. Many Christians would like Dave to sit down and
discuss his past affiliation and teachings on elder reconfirmation
(and other doctrines). So until Dave is
willing to "give an answer"
(as commanded in 1 Pet 3:15) many conservative brothers do not want to use his materials
(without at least warning others about Dave’s
possible errors).
WVBS & Other Materials - DVDs, Books, etc.
Disclaimer: While many NASA scientists agree with the conclusions reached in the first video presentation above, it is politically incorrect in America's present climate for NASA to officially endorse these conclusions. The first head of NASA, Wernher Von Braun, (awarded more honorary doctorates, 25, than anyone before him) wrote letters to school boards strongly recommending that they teach this kind of evidence in the public school science classrooms. (Because of his stand, some evolutionists have called Dr. Von Braun a second rate scientist.)
But, since 1962-1963, nine unelected government officials (Supreme Court) have re-interpreted (lied about) the Constitution and forced the separation of these evidences from the classrooms. Results: our students' science grades have gotten worse ever since. We now rank at or near the bottom in Math and Science worldwide (in competition with "civilized" countries). We used to have the number one education system in the world, from the 1600s until the mid 1900s. Let us return to the great Biblical heritage that our country was founded upon (See America's Godly Heritage flyer).
Making up a story (evolution) to fit SELECTED facts is no more science than a Hollywood movie. Which is harder - changing your story (and therefore admitting you used to be wrong) or hiding the new facts that contradict your theory? Evolution has tried both of these.
There are many false religions in this world. Even true religion has been distorted by man (denominations - see the historical documentation and locations. Examples: Sun worship & Infant baptism have pagan roots.). Evolution is just one of many false religions. Evolution is more like a poor Hollywood story, than science. We need to look for a religious and scientific system that has evidence. Man has always distorted the truth. Remember, the Bible predicted 2000 years ago that man would deny creation and a world-wide flood (2 Pet 3:3-6).
|
General Evidences:
Evolutionists Best
Arguments Answered National Geographic Shoots Itself in the Foot—Again! Evolution’s Best Evidences Exposed As Weak To Pitiful: (by two authors who each have a Ph.D. in science) THE LATEST SELF-INFLICTED SHOT IN THE FOOT—NOVEMBER 2004. The front cover of the November 2004 issue of National Geographic screamed—in giant dark-maroon letters—“Was Darwin Wrong?” The answer, of course, as provided in 250-point bold type at the beginning of an article that began on page 2, was “NO: the evidence for evolution is overwhelming.” But long before the reader ever gets to the beginning of the article, there is a strong hint that another disaster similar to that of the Archaeoraptor fiasco is beginning to take shape. Sure enough, it is. ... 15 Answers to John Rennie and Scientific American's Nonsense (Full version) () As of July 2002, however, evolutionists took that battle to an entirely different level. ... Scientific American, editor in chief John Rennie published ... “15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense.” With a variant of vitriol and dogmatism rarely seen in the scientific arena, Mr. Rennie leveled a sustained attack on both creationism and creationists ... “Only the intellectually challenged would dare doubt the scientific validity of evolution; and only an idiot would dare defend belief in creation.” Enough is enough! No amount of pejorative terminology on the part of editors and journalists is going to make the scientific evidence supporting creation somehow “disappear.” And no amount of intellectual snobbery on the part of materialistic scientists is going to make the woefully weak case for evolution somehow “stronger.” A significant ... The Big Bang Theory—A Scientific Critique [Part II - Whole] () In 1978, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson were honored with the Nobel Prize in physics ... cosmic microwave background radiation. Described by some evolutionists as the “remnant afterglow of the Big Bang,” it is viewed as a faint light shining back to the beginning of the Universe ... This radiation, found in the form of microwaves, has been seized upon by proponents of the Big Bang Theory as proof of an initial catastrophic beginning—the “bang”—of our Universe. However, the temperature estimates of “space” were first published in 1896, even prior to George Gamow’s birth in 1904 (see Guillaume, 1896). C.E. Guillaume’s estimation was 5-6 K, and rather than blaming that temperature on some type of “Big Bang” explosion, he credited the stars belonging to our own galaxy. ... Creationists Fight Back! A Review of U.S. News & World Report (Full version) () It used to be that the only things certain in life were taxes and death. According to journalist Thomas Hayden, we now can add organic evolution to that list. The latest effort to shore up the ever-faltering theory of evolution was the cover story of the July 29, 2002 issue of U.S. News & World Report.... Yes, the slick graphics and full-color photos presented in Hayden’s article are impressive. And yes, the diminutive amount of alleged scientific evidence tossed in for good measure no doubt will convince some unsuspecting readers that evolution is indeed a “fact.” But the actual evidence tells an entirely different story. Sadly, this type of grandstanding and propagandizing in the media occurs all too often. And many people accept it as the “final word” on the subject—without any real knowledge as to what the evidence truly reveals. Given that millions of people read and respect U.S. News & World Report, we felt a thorough review of “The New Reality of Evolution” was in order. Someone needs to tell—if we may borrow a well-known phrase from respected news commentator Paul Harvey—“the rest of the story.” Here is that story. The Scientific Case For Creation Free Book (eBook): ... Books are being written by evolutionists that attack the creationist stance; books are being written by creationists that attack the evolutionist stance. National news media have become involved. Science associations have become involved. Teachers’ associations and political groups have become involved. Far from diminishing, the controversy seems to be increasing. And both sides acknowledge that it is not likely to “go away.” As one evolutionist put it ...
Carbon 14 and the age of the Earth: Dating in Archaeology: Radiocarbon & Tree-Ring Dating The purpose of this first article is to discuss problems with radiocarbon and tree-ring dating (or dendrochronology), which are the two most common direct dating techniques in archaeology. Problems with relative dating by interpretation of material culture—arrowheads, pottery, tools—will be the subject of the next article. ... tree-ring dating. This venerable science began in the early part of the twentieth century when A.E. Douglass was looking for a way to investigate the historical relationship between solar activity and climate. He noticed variations in the width of annual growth rings in yellow pine trees growing around Flagstaff, Arizona. The year-to-year variations were the result of ... Superman and the Myth of Carbon-14 Dating Without going into detail of the ins and outs of carbon-14 dating, consider one basic truth about this dating method that few people (especially in the film industry), it seems, have been taught: radiocarbon dating is totally ineffective in measuring time when dealing with millions of years. In his 2000 book, Genes, People, and Languages, renowned geneticist of Stanford University, Luigi Cavalli-Sforza, in a discussion ... RATE Project Disproves Ancient Earth ... On November 5, 2005, the RATE research team presented groundbreaking research to more than 2,300 people who had gathered in San Diego for this special conference ... The panel of scientists introduced experimental evidence that poses serious problems for the evolutionary theory, and that strongly supports a young age for the Earth. ... some evolutionists would rather hide by attacking the researchers than deal with the evidence they presented. ... Russell Humphreys, Professor of Physics ... his research on helium diffusion, strongly indicating that the age of the Earth is only about 6,000 years,... Dr. Andrew Snelling, Professor of Geology, .... His research team investigated radiohalos. ...
America's Biblical Heritage Separation of church and state? Liberals and compromisers must love telling lies. Or maybe they would like to tell the truth, but they cannot get the truth to fit their agenda. For 50 years, Americans have been lied to about America's Christian type heritage. These liars ignore the monuments, writings, congressional records, Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Founding Father's personal writings, Supreme Court decisions, names of cities, presidential declarations, etc. from America's founding years. Many of the textbooks and media outlets make claims such as: our “national government was secular from top to bottom,” or that the Founders “reared a national government on a secular basis.” This is a total lie. But how are you to know? Download our flyers such as "America's Godly Heritage" or "God Said Vote" or see these free online videos (The Silencing of God, etc.). You will NOT have to sign up or give us any information to watch these free online videos. A great resource on America’s Godly Heritage is Dave Miller's (Ph.D., Apologetics Press) seminars and articles. Dr. Miller has the best video on the subject. You can get the two DVD set that contains 5 lessons on the Silencing of God in America. He also does a great job at calling the Lord’s Church back to what they need to be doing. But as you may know, many Christians would like Dave to sit down and discuss his past affiliation and teachings on elder reconfirmation (and other doctrines). So until Dave is willing to "give an answer" (1 Pet 3:15) many conservative brothers do not want to use his materials (without at least warning others about Dave’s possible errors). Here is a link to many articles on America's Godly Heritage and the culture war, by Apologetics Press. Dr. Miller also has some excellent lessons and videos on Islam & Muhammad (Articles, DVDs, online videos).
Truth
About Dinosaurs Flash VIDEOS with hundreds of pictures, animations, research results, etc. on the subject of creation versus evolution. Scroll down for more information: Scientific and Biblical information on creation. Also, click here to see pictures of our sixteen foot model of Noah's Ark (online video). Also see WhyBaptism.org DINOSAURS Video
Seminar 1,
Evidence That Man &
Dinosaurs Co-existed, & How Did Noah Fit All Those
Animals On The Ark?
(480x360)
Video Seminar 2,
Truth About
Dinosaurs. Dinosaurs Are Used To Teach Evolution, But The Evidence Says
...
(640x480)
Video Seminar 3,
Discover The Truth.
Lesson 1 of 5:
Dinosaurs, The Ark, & The Age Of The Earth
(720x406)
God Is Not The Author Of Confusion
- New Baptism Site There is a new website with over 17 pages of just links (to 100s of articles, videos, and audios) on just one subject, BAPTISM. It includes recordings of live TV call-in shows, 4 night debates, PDF articles, audio recordings, etc. It uses only the Bible to answer your questions on baptism. Many have been falsely taught that we are not to judge. Yet, Jesus said in John 7:24 "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment." Proverbs 25:9 says "Debate thy cause with thy neighbor himself..." (KJV). Jude 3 "... ye should earnestly contend for the faith ...". Acts 17:2 "... Paul ... reasoned with them out of the scriptures." Acts 24:25 "And as he (Paul) reasoned of righteousness ... Felix trembled, ..." See WhyBaptism.org., The Truth About FAITH, and also see What is the purpose of Baptism? Does the purpose matter? Why did the men in Acts 19 have to be re-baptized? World's most famous thief - What about the Thief on the cross? Was he baptized? Is he our example today? Does the method of baptism matter to God? When should a person be baptized (as a infant, or as an adult)? How many preachers on TV allow live call-ins? Why don't they? Read 1 Pet 3:14-15 & 1 Cor 1:10. (Answer even your enemies & we are commanded to have unity. These are not options, they are commands.) 1st Video: Can we be saved like the thief on the cross? I want to be saved like the thief on the cross, but not like the rich young ruler ... nd Video: Being Blunt got through. Caller admits one lesson showed him what the Bible says on baptism so clear that he needs to change. ...3rd Video: Baptist smarter than Peter. Baptism "for the remission of sins"? What is the context? Baptist will not even read Acts 2:38 out loud. Why? ... 4th Video: Baptist preacher behaving badly. I thought Christians were commanded to be ready to give and answer. This young preacher (Micah) was invited to Sunday school by Pastor Andrews-and then threatened when he came in! See ... 5th Video: When you question some preachers in public (on baptism & other doctrines), their families call you up and threaten bodily harm (.38 Special). Bishop's wife threatens ... 6th Video: How to quickly answer denominational errors. Anti-Christ is saved, do not judge, join the Church, Billy Graham, Baptist churches do not baptize for ... 7th Video: The Baptist church is not in the Bible. But when you get people to recognize this, some get ...
Causes of Unbelief [Part I]
Most rational, reasonable people would
agree that actions have consequences. If a man commits a crime, is
pursued and apprehended by law enforcement officers, tried by a jury
of his peers, and sentenced to life in the penitentiary or death in
the electric chair, who is responsible? When an individual decides
to act, is it not true that ultimately the consequences of those
actions fall squarely on his or her shoulders? Indeed, actions do
have consequences. Causes of Unbelief [Part II] Pride: When the Lord asked in John 5:44, “How can ye believe, who receive glory one of another, and the glory that cometh from the only God ye seek not?,” He summed up one of the main reasons why many are unprepared to believe in God. Man is so busy seeking and reveling in his own glory that he has neither the time nor the desire to offer glory to His Maker. An unhealthy lust for power wrapped in a cloak of pride breeds unbelief. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (he of “God is dead” fame) expressed ... The Case for the Existence of God [Part I] One of the most basic, and most fundamental, issues that can be considered by the human mind is the question, “Does God exist?” In the field of logic, there are principles—or ... The only way to answer this question, of course, is to seek out and examine the evidence. It certainly is reasonable to suggest that if there is a God, He would make available to us evidence adequate to the task of proving His existence. But does such evidence exist? And if it does, what is the nature of that evidence? The Case for the Existence of God [Part II] One of the laws of thought employed in the field of logic is the law of rationality, which states that one should accept as true only those conclusions for which there is adequate evidence. ...
The Case for the Existence of God [Part III]
(by Wayne Jackson, M.A.)
An examination into the existence of morality and ethics provides
yet another link in the chain of logical thought that establishes
the case for the existence of God. ... anthropological, or
moral, argument for God’s existence. ... If there is no purpose in
the Universe, as Simpson and others have asserted, then actually
there is no purpose to morality or ethics. But the concept of a
purposeless morality, or a purposeless ethic, does not make sense,
and so men have sought to read some meaning, as far-fetched as it
may be, into the natural human inclination to recognize the need for
morality. Let us give brief attention to several of the theories
that propose to explain the function of human ethics. ...
Evil Pain & Suffering Where Is God When I Hurt Why Do Inocent People Suffer How Could A Loving God Let This Happen?
Philosophers love to attack God
with the question about evil pain
and suffering.
Articles that answer this argument:
|
